I “felt” Gene came across as being more Gay-centered, rather than God-centered, which is a big statement to make about someone in his position. I felt he had a brilliant opportunity to share more about the gospel to an audience that was incredibly varied and clearly regarded him as a hero (no pun intended).

To look from the perspective of human rights is difficult for me because part of me assumes that everyone thinks GBLT-bashing is abhorrent. So I immediately think of the children (hence why I asked the question). Should children have the right to start life with a mother and father? I believe so. Does it happen? No, not often enough. Biologically, I can’t see a great deal of justification, despite the singular study that Gene mentioned. I was disappointed that he did not embark on a scriptural perspective as well.

Another question I wanted to ask was Gene’s perspective on sex outside of marriage. Given the gay community has a reputation for promiscuity (I know more lesbians than gays and they’re not promiscuous at all), I was intrigued to know if he held a “no sex before marriage” stance or not.

The scientific section did nothing for me. It was too brief and skewed, in my opinion (I’m off to investigate the facts!!). Nature versus Nurture is such a massive debate that I can’t accept the stance put forth by the movie. I need more data - the downfall of being an engineer, perhaps.

There appear to be some 30 stations in the London network - no where near enough to make it useful to the majority.